Overshadowed by rising geopolitical tensions, there was an alternative future for the Ukraine, heralded by cooperation with China. It was based on stability and development. It was viable, and it was denied.
AS I have argued, the Ukrainian crisis was not warranted, but the ultimate outcome of the NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) expansion, as American foreign policy leaders predicted in 1997 with great foresight ("Ukraine crisis, global fallout: Colossal failure of diplomacy," TMT, February 28).
Already have an active account? Log in here.
Continue reading with one of these options:
Continue reading with one of these options:
Premium + Digital Edition
Ad-free access
P 80 per month
(billed annually at P 960)
- Unlimited ad-free access to website articles
- Limited offer: Subscribe today and get digital edition access for free (accessible with up to 3 devices)
TRY FREE FOR 14 DAYS
See details
See details
If you have an active account, log in
here
.