SOMETIME last week, we were surprised when the Supreme Court issued a ruling declaring the Joint Maritime Seismic Undertaking, or JMSU, unconstitutional. Honestly, I wasn't even aware that Bayan Muna representatives led by former congressman Teddy Casiño and Satur Ocampo had filed a petition for certiorari and prohibition assailing the constitutionality of the JMSU. It has been almost two decades since the undertaking was entered into by three countries — China, Vietnam and the Philippines.
Actually, I have been using the issue of the JMSU as a possible approach to resolving the territorial dispute in the contested areas of the South China Sea, describing it as a win-win solution for everyone wherein every claimant country could harness its potential without giving up or fighting anyone else for the right to do so.
Continue reading with one of these options:
Ad-free access
P 80 per month
(billed annually at P 960)
- Unlimited ad-free access to website articles
- Limited offer: Subscribe today and get digital edition access for free (accessible with up to 3 devices)